Principals Roundtable: Tighter Fees a Huge Challenge
by Staff | Tuesday, October 23, 2012 | 2 Comments

Nokia in Silicon Valley by Gensler, the firm ranked number one in Interior Design's Top 100 Giants according to earnings; however, many firms still struggle to attain their pre-recession level fees. Photo by Nic Lehoux.
This is the first in a series of articles that will cover the main issues discussed at the recent principals roundtable held by Interior Design and IIDA at NeoCon East in Baltimore, Md.
It should come as no surprise that the 20 or so top executives of design and architectural firms who attended Interior Design and IIDA’s principal’s roundtable last week agreed that they are working harder, longer and more intensely than ever before. The kicker, however, is that they are also earning the same or even less than they earned prior to the 2008 recession.
“Clients expect more, but aren’t willing to pay more,” said an executive of a large global design firm. (To ensure a frank and open conversation about the high priority issues impacting the design industry, Interior Design and IIDA agreed not to identify attendees.)
In fact, many who attended the roundtable held at last week’s NeoCon East in Baltimore, Md., don’t see the shrinking fee structure changing any time soon. “They want more services for less,” said a principal of a mid-sized design firm. “The problem is that as the fees go down, it is hard to get them back up again. This impacts everything.”
To understand how tighter fees have impacted companies, many in the group noted that firms used to assign ten designers to a project and now assign only three. Even working and focusing on one project is a luxury from a bygone era, with most designers tackling several at once to be more cost-effective.
Question: Are stagnant or declining fees for the same or more work than you did four to five years ago the number one issue facing design firms today? Respond here.
Most assigned the blame to brokerage firms who are branching out into areas traditionally handled by design or architecture firms. “Brokers are setting the tone, sending out RFPs to firms and telling clients that this is the way to get the best price,” said an executive of a large design firm, adding that brokers are also moving into the planning and programming stages. This, she said, is happening increasingly in the corporate field.
Added another design executive: “The best value is not finding the cheapest partner, the cheapest designer or architect… but that’s what they are hearing from the brokers.” The group agreed that sometimes a broker would advise a client to go for a higher priced space, convincing them that they can save on the build out. This often leads to unrealistic expectations when it comes to the fees and scope of work.
“The solution is to write concise, tight contracts. We will do these five things for this much,“ said one executive from a large design firm, adding that clients usually understand once you show them that that their requests are outside the agreed upon scope. Still, she pointed out, a firm is more constrained with new clients compared with repeat clients who have worked through the issue before. Nevertheless, she said: “ It can’t be architecture by the pound.”
Question: Do you find the increasing influence that brokers have with clients hurts your business and creates unrealistic expectations? Respond here.
Still, business has picked up with multi-family, healthcare and higher education leading the way. It’s an increase relegated to certain regions of the country, with a strong showing in the D.C. areas, for example, thanks in part to government projects. “The work is healthy, but the fee structure is not,” said one design executive, adding that her practice is inundated with work due to new construction. “Still it’s hard to make money. You can’t deliver the hip, the cool and the new at this fee structure.”
And that, on nearly every level, is what clients are looking for and expect without having to pay additional for it.
2 comments
share your comment
Featured
-
Olson Kundig Launches Artisan Workshops for Public
by Lauren DeBellis | posted on May 23, 2013
-
Major Changes Hit Chicago’s Merchandise Mart
by Andrew Stone | posted on May 15, 2013
-
Editors’ Picks: BKLYN Designs 10th Anniversary
by Staff | posted on May 14, 2013
Most Popular
Herman Miller Takes Ownership of Maharam by Meghan Edwards | posted on April 24, 2013
Weekly Top Five: Kitchen & Bath by Staff | posted on April 30, 2013
Two Architects Launch NY Design Fairs by Annie Block | posted on April 30, 2013
Most Popular
Latest
-
Brazil’s Claudia Moreira Salles Exhibits at Espasso
by Jesse Dorris | posted on May 24, 2013
-
IIDA NY Honors Local Leaders
by Staff | posted on May 23, 2013
-
Olson Kundig Launches Artisan Workshops for Public
by Lauren DeBellis | posted on May 23, 2013
Recent Comments
- Sandralisa C. on 26 Firms Make NYC’s Design + Construction List
- Justine Mis on FENDI Casa Designs Virgin Gorda Penthouse
- Kendra Ritter on American Sign Museum Worships Design Doctrine
- Terrence Sumner on 10 Questions with… Elena Pacenti
- Noha Elhelaly on FENDI Casa Designs Virgin Gorda Penthouse
Visit our Sites
Archives
interior design
Posted Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 02:04 am | Permalink
That design looks just Great. good work keep it up
Bobbi
Posted Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 12:35 pm | Permalink
Good article. Interior Design firms need to get together to discuss solutions to unreasonable expectations. Before attending design school as a non-traditional student, I sold Avon. A woman dominated field, wherein most of the top selling woman gave away high percentages of their profits to the customer. Although Avon always had discounts, these woman would be earning earning 45% but gave discounts of 40%, hence their profit was 5% + taxes (self-employment tax).
To hear successful firms having to lower their prices is outrageous. The material suppliers, construction professional, electrical and plumbers do not pro-rate their cost. I wonder if all of the design firms would reject these greedy clients, stay with the true cost for work, and above all, do not let them set your prices. This will help to get these brokerage firms out of our profession.
Thank you